Quick Answer
AI detectors all promise to tell you whether ChatGPT wrote something. The truth is messier: they are useful signals with a real accuracy ceiling and a false-positive problem nobody has solved. Here is an honest comparison of the main tools, what each is good for, and how to read any score without overtrusting it.
At a Glance: AI Detector Comparison
| Detector | Type | Free tier | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| How Many Words AI Detector | In-browser, statistical | Yes, fully free | Quick private self-checks |
| Turnitin | Institutional, LMS-integrated | Via institution only | Instructors grading submissions |
| GPTZero | Web app, education focus | Yes, with limits | Teachers and students |
| Originality.ai | Web app, paid credits | No (paid) | Publishers, SEO, agencies |
| Copyleaks | Enterprise API + web | Limited trial | Enterprise, multilingual |
| ZeroGPT | Free consumer web app | Yes | Casual quick checks |
| OpenAI Classifier | Discontinued (2023) | N/A | No longer available |
Accuracy figures from vendors are typically higher than independent test results. Treat all scores as estimates.
The Detectors, One by One
How Many Words AI Detector (Free, In-Browser)
Our own AI Detector runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, there is no signup, and it is free. It scores the same statistical signals the research literature relies on: burstiness (sentence-length variance), vocabulary diversity, n-gram repetition, punctuation patterns, and structure. It is built for quick self-checks before you submit, so you can see roughly what an instructor's tool might see, privately. Like every detector, it gives a probability, not a verdict.
Turnitin
The default at thousands of universities because it is built into the submission workflow. Instructors get an AI percentage automatically, alongside the familiar similarity report. Its strength is integration, not unique accuracy. Independent results place it in the same band as its rivals, and several institutions have limited or disabled it over false positives. Covered in depth in does Turnitin detect ChatGPT?
GPTZero
One of the first consumer detectors and still widely used in education. It offers a free tier and reports sentence-level highlights plus perplexity and burstiness metrics. Popular with teachers and students who want a quick external opinion. Same caveats on accuracy and false positives apply.
Originality.ai
Aimed at publishers, agencies, and SEO teams rather than schools. It is paid (credit-based) and bundles AI detection with plagiarism checking and team features. Often cited for strong benchmark numbers, though those are vendor figures, and it shares the universal weakness on lightly edited and non-native writing.
Copyleaks
Enterprise-oriented, with an API, multilingual support, and integrations for businesses and institutions. Best for organizations that need detection at scale or in languages beyond English. Limited free trial; pricing is built for teams.
ZeroGPT
A free, consumer-facing web app that is convenient for a fast look. Its accuracy has been questioned in independent comparisons more than the tools above, so it is best treated as a rough first pass rather than a reliable judgment.
OpenAI's Discontinued Classifier
Worth remembering: OpenAI released its own AI text classifier in early 2023 and shut it down that July, citing low accuracy. It caught only about 26% of AI text as likely AI. If the company that built the models could not build a reliable detector, that tells you something about the ceiling everyone is working under.
The Honest Truth About Accuracy
Three things are true of every detector on this list:
- They are probabilistic. A score is a likelihood, not a fact. The same text can score differently across tools and across updates.
- Editing beats them. Varying sentence length, cutting stock phrases, and adding specifics lowers scores everywhere. These are also the marks of good writing, as our humanize AI text guide explains.
- They produce false positives. The 2023 Stanford study (Liang et al.) showed clear bias against non-native English writers. Formulaic human writing also gets flagged.
How to Read a Detector Score
For students: use a detector to check your own draft before submitting, not to game anyone. If your honest writing scores high, that is useful to know. Keep your version history either way. See can professors tell if you used ChatGPT?
For teachers: treat a high score as a reason to look closer, never as standalone proof. Combine it with drafts, voice comparison, and a conversation. For the ethics framing students are weighing, see is using AI to write essays cheating?
For everyone: detectors estimate, they do not prove. Use the best tool for your context, read the score as a signal, and remember that the strongest defense (and the strongest writing) is specific, varied, genuinely human work.
Sources
- Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns (Cell Press), arXiv:2304.02819.
- OpenAI. (2023). New AI classifier for indicating AI-written text (discontinued July 2023 due to low accuracy).
- Mitchell, E., Lee, K., Khazatsky, A., Manning, C.D., & Finn, C. (2023). DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature. Stanford University.
- Gehrmann, S., Strobelt, H., & Rush, A.M. (2019). GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text. Harvard NLP / MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab.
- Sadasivan, V.S., Kumar, A., Balasubramanian, S., Wang, W., & Feizi, S. (2023). Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? University of Maryland, arXiv:2303.11156.
- Turnitin. (2023). AI writing detection: Understanding the false positive rate. Turnitin Help Center.